Trump's lawyers have decided not to contest the fact uncovered by the House. They are simply arguing now that THE FACTS DON'T MATTER. Never let it be said that politicians are faster and smarter than academics.
This is what I am alluding to:
This is what I am alluding to:
In
July 1990 in American Literary Scholarship (55) Brian Higgins printed my warning that Neal Tolchin’s
transcriptions from family letters in Mourning,
Gender, and Creativity in the Art of Herman Melville were not to be trusted, specifying a particularly
disastrous misreading of a letter Melville’s mother wrote in February 1846. In
December 1990 the Melville Society meeting was packed with new New
Historicists, second-generation New Leftists (who had fervor but less purpose
than the first), and a large group of second- and third-generation New Critics
who had never done archival research and had certainly not been taught to do
responsible research. Sitting up front with Harrison Hayford, John Bryant, and
Wai-Chee Dimock, I misread the atmosphere in the room as one of free-floating
political correctness, not sharply focused, but the mood of the audience was
hostile from the start. When Wai-chee Dimock resurrected Lewis Mumford’s
long-refuted claim that Hawthorne had based Ethan Brand on Melville (before he
met him or read anything but Typee),
Hayford mildly reproved her, saying that if she thought it was acceptable to
bring forth the Ethan Brand claim as a serious possibility, she was using a
different standard for evidence than he used. At that, there was a subterranean
murmur of anger in the audience like the incipient rebellion in Billy Budd, the
mood hardening into fury that anyone’s idea could be considered invalid on
grounds of biographical evidence. In the new post-scholarly climate to point
out errors was to violate the playground rules: one should always enhance one’s
playmate’s self-esteem. The audience was further incited by a man standing at
the open door, a satanic red-bearded
stranger (more mildly described by Robert K. Wallace in Melville and Turner (611)
as “the petulant stranger in the doorway”). The satanic onlooker kept crying out, with regard to Melville and
history, ‘THE FACTS DON’T MATTER.’” ‘THE
FACTS DON’T MATTER.’” ‘THE FACTS DON’T MATTER.’” ‘THE FACTS DON’T MATTER.’” Accepting reality,
I never attended another Melville Society meeting in the United States.
No comments:
Post a Comment