I know I could look her up but life is short.
"That truth should be silent I had almost forgot"--Enobarbus in ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA, back in Rome after having been too long in Egypt.--------- Melville's PIERRE, Book 4, chapter 5: "Something ever comes of all persistent inquiry; we are not so continually curious for nothing."
Friday, October 31, 2014
#2 in the October 2014 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION
JOURNAL
OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION 31 October 2014
Enjoy our top 10 most popular
articles of October 2014…
- The Myth of “Granny Gates” by Will Monk
- Fanning Outfoxes Marion by Hershel Parker
- Bartholomew von Heer and Marechaussee Corps by Bob Ruppert
- 10 Remarkable Runaway Ads by Don N. Hagist
- Allen McLane: Case Study in History and Folklore by Kim Burdick
- The Battle of Golden Hill – Six Weeks Before the Boston Massacre by Bob Ruppert
- The Three Documents that Brought France into the War by Bob Ruppert
- Billy Flora at the Battle of Great Bridge by Norman Fuss
- Anthony Wayne’s 1782 Savannah Campaign by Hugh T. Harrington
- The Partisan and Queen’s Ranger by Benjamin Huggins
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
Dating the Battle at Brown Marsh--Does Anyone Care But Me?
Historians have said very late September or very early October. Here is a witness, more than half a century later:
John Sarrett W312: “eight days subsequent to which time [the day of the battle at Livingston’s Bridge] declarent was engaged in the battle of brown marsh, at a place called Baldwin’s plantation; during which engagement declarent lost his horse—this engagement was against the tories and some British also—in which we were defeated owing entirely, as declarant is of opinion, to the bad management of Gen Butler the commanding officer.”
If the battle at Livingston's Bridge was on September 23, 1781 and the battle at Brown Marsh was 8 days later, that would be
24 25 26 27 28 29 30---
October 1, 1781 for the date of the battle at Brown Marsh?
Does it matter? Come on, we want to know.
Saturday, October 25, 2014
General John Butler and the Level of his Incompetence--Would Never Happen in Academia
After looking day by day at General Butler's incompetence and actual cowardice in 1780 and 1781 and 1782 I began casting my mind back to see if I could remember anyone in the academic world who got promotions regularly despite his or her obvious incompetence and lived to retire to general approval. I can't think of a single one. How superior the academic world is to the military! Now, where did I put the sheet I printed out from Caruthers on Butler? I had it a minute ago.
Monday, October 20, 2014
Still alive--working on HOPELESS GENERAL and HAPLESS GOVERNOR for the Journal of the American Revolution
Or Fumble and Bumble, General John Butler and Governor Thomas Burke.
Here's a bit of one soldier's recollection of Butler in battle:
Here's a bit of one soldier's recollection of Butler in battle:
In this tour we marched towards Wilmington North Carolina,
but before we reached that place we fell in with a party of the British,
consisting of about 200 at Brown’s Marsh, and fought a battle with them in the
night, in which battle I was wounded by a musket ball, which passed through my
left hip. General William [really, John] Butler, Colonels Moore, William Lytle
and Robert Mebane were all in this battle, but which of them was at the head of
our party I do not know, though I think it was Colonel Mebane. General Butler
was there at the beginning of the action, but left us very soon. Some say the
General’s horse got scared and ran off with him, but others said the General
got scared and ran off with his horse. How the fact was I know not.”
This sort of research is possible because of the work of Will Graves and C. Leon Harris.
Thursday, October 16, 2014
John Grisham Stumbles into the GOTCHA! World
Pity John Grisham, who spoke openly and honestly about how some man he knew clicked from site to site until he found one on 16 year old hookers and CLICKED on it, only to have the fatal knock on the door before very long.
There is a vast array of lurkers out there who do not embody noble virtues in their daily lives but who storm out to denounce anyone who puts a toe out of their self-defined PC fences. Anyone who would flame (and defame) John Grisham for these comments is despicable, but apt to be very powerful in this new world.
A challenge for the self-righteous fanatic: BRING DOWN JOHN GRISHAM.
What a sick bunch of PC lurkers. What a sad world when the fanatics can misinterpret a fine man's meditations on a friend's experience.
Now, I thought that SYCAMORE book could have been cut down by half . . . .
There is a vast array of lurkers out there who do not embody noble virtues in their daily lives but who storm out to denounce anyone who puts a toe out of their self-defined PC fences. Anyone who would flame (and defame) John Grisham for these comments is despicable, but apt to be very powerful in this new world.
A challenge for the self-righteous fanatic: BRING DOWN JOHN GRISHAM.
What a sick bunch of PC lurkers. What a sad world when the fanatics can misinterpret a fine man's meditations on a friend's experience.
Now, I thought that SYCAMORE book could have been cut down by half . . . .
Sunday, October 12, 2014
Thursday, October 9, 2014
Wednesday, October 8, 2014
My #2 article in the great webzine JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION
http://allthingsliberty.com/2014/10/fanning-outfoxes-marion/
The opening paragraph:
When news of Lord Cornwallis’s surrender at Yorktown on October 19, 1781 arrived in southeastern North Carolina well into November, the war there did not end. It did not end even after the British evacuated Wilmington on November 18, leaving local Tories without reliable supplies of ammunition. Instead, as William Ryan, a cavalry man under Captain Daniel Gillespie, recalled in his pension application, it got more brutal: “The Tories under Col Fanning and other tory leaders seemed to be driven to despair by the surrender of Cornwallis. They divided themselves into small parties and prowled about the country & sought every opportunity to commit the most cruel and unprovoked murders & so frequent were murders robberies & Arsons committed by them that the Counties of Guilford Randolph & Chatham were in a state of continual alarm throughout the fall and winter of 1781 & the spring & summer of 1782—and the tories did not give up the control until the British wholly evacuated South Carolina.”[1] . . . .
I first published in a historical journal, the New-York Historical Quarterly, in 1964. What a pleasure to be in a historical webzine!
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
Ann Jefferson in TLS--Being Short of Money Excuses any Behavior!
Ann Jefferson on why Paul de Man wrote Anti-Semitic articles: "Financial necessity was . . . the most likely motive for his contributions to the Belgian daily Le Soir, under its new collaborationist editorship."
Ann Jefferson in TLS on Paul de Man's Cleverness in getting into Harvard
Somebody, could it have been Paul de Man, perpetrated a little trickery--well, not trickery exactly but magic:
"The next step was graduate school and it appears that de Man's entry to the Comparative Literature programme at Harvard was effected by sleight of hand."
Who could the magician have been? A clerk at the Comparative Literature program?
No, maybe it was de Man himself, for Jefferson continues with this curiously passive construction:
"The transcript from the Universite[need acute accent] libre de Bruxelles was fraudulently glossed by de Man to confirm that he had obtained a Bachelor's degree with distinction."
It was not as if Paul de Man were guilty of anything: "He was clearly incapable of complying with rules and requirements, and he equally clearly had a knack for succeeding on his own terms."
And yet that wicked wicked Evelyn Barish makes against poor blighted de Man "an insidiously blanket accusation of deviousness." Barish, you take my breath away!
I have never read a more contemptible piece than Ann Jefferson's in the TLS.
"The next step was graduate school and it appears that de Man's entry to the Comparative Literature programme at Harvard was effected by sleight of hand."
Who could the magician have been? A clerk at the Comparative Literature program?
No, maybe it was de Man himself, for Jefferson continues with this curiously passive construction:
"The transcript from the Universite[need acute accent] libre de Bruxelles was fraudulently glossed by de Man to confirm that he had obtained a Bachelor's degree with distinction."
It was not as if Paul de Man were guilty of anything: "He was clearly incapable of complying with rules and requirements, and he equally clearly had a knack for succeeding on his own terms."
And yet that wicked wicked Evelyn Barish makes against poor blighted de Man "an insidiously blanket accusation of deviousness." Barish, you take my breath away!
I have never read a more contemptible piece than Ann Jefferson's in the TLS.
Ann Jefferson in the TLS Redefines "Misdemeanours" in her Worship of Paul de Man
De Man was guilty of "gross mismanagement" at the Agence Dechenne and the Toison d'Or.
1. "He mislaid manuscripts."
2. He "passed off translations by others as his own."
3. He "mishandled purchases."
Passing off others' work as your own is "mismanagement," but these faults are only "misdemeanours," Ann Jefferson assures us.
Ann Jefferson knows that there is of course no really serious crime in stealing other people's work--that's a common academic misdemeanor. It's not as if de Man were really stealing IDEAS. He was only stealing translations at this time.
Ann Jefferson on Paul de Man--the Most Contemptible article in TLS since when?
I can't stop looking at Ann Jefferson's worshipful exoneration of Paul de Man and her relentless attack on Evelyn Barish's THE DOUBLE LIFE OF PAUL DE MAN.
You know why poor blighted de Man (his "early life was blighted by unhappy family circumstances") was absolutely forced to write anti-Semitic articles for LE SOIR? You don't?
I knew there was a good reason!
You know why poor blighted de Man (his "early life was blighted by unhappy family circumstances") was absolutely forced to write anti-Semitic articles for LE SOIR? You don't?
Oh, Ann Jefferson will tell you: "Financial necessity was therefore the most likely motive for his contributions to the Belgian daily Le Soir, under its new collaborationist editorship."
I knew there was a good reason!
When Santa Monica was a little beach town and there was a hardware store on Montana
Long long ago Montana Avenue in Santa Monica was a quiet
street where you could park anywhere and run errands. There was a hardware
store somewhere around 10th street, on the north side. One day I was
in there looking for clipboards. I ended up buying 2 of them, 15” wide and 20”
high. Leo Lemay came in while I was there so we talked about Leon Howard’s next
visit from Albuquerque. Whenever Leon
came back to LA he would send Leo a guest list and send me a guest list for
people he wanted to see. There would be some overlapping, always. I got more of
the Valley people (the Northridge crowd) than Leo did, while Leo got more of
the UCLA friends. I took the clipboards home and removed the metal at once, for
what I wanted was smooth lapboards for holding masses of paper, not outsized
clipboards. Even in their reduced state as lapboards, they reminded me of Leo.
Now I need to take one of them and glue a
brace across it, 5 inches or so from the bottom of the 20 inch side, something
thick enough to stop dozens of pages of paper so I can sit and sort through
them and keep the pages from sliding down to my middle where I can’t work with
them. This “reading board” is still going to remind me of the Montana Avenue
hardware store and Leo and Santa Monica when it was a little beach
town.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)